Nixon Shock Part I Why Richard Nixon Torpedoed The Global Monetary System

TITLE: Nixon Shock (Part I): Why Richard Nixon torpedoed the global monetary system | The Story of Money CHANNEL: The Story of Money Podcast | Financial Times DATE: 2026-06-03 ---TRANSCRIPT--- In 1955, for example, the US [music] had 165% more gold than it needed to redeem all the dollars outside the US. But by 1970, 1971, it [music] only had 25%. There was a fear in the US and actually in other countries too, that they would come to the US, say, “Here are dollars. We want gold.” And the US wouldn’t be able to redeem it. Germany alone had more dollars than there was gold in Fort Knox.

So, drum roll. I have directed Secretary Connley to suspend temporarily the convertability of the dollar into gold. [music] [music] Today on the story of money, what happens when the president of the United States of America makes a shocking unilateral decision to torpedo the entire postwar global economic order? And nope, this time we’re not talking about Donald Trump. Let us take you back instead to 900 p.m. East Coast time on the 15th of August,

US President Richard Milhouse Nixon is making a surprise appearance on the major TV networks, elbowing aside a scheduled viewing of Bonanza. That was then the biggest TV show in America at the time.

American audiences had actually grown pretty used to these kind of unscheduled addresses. Nixon typically used them to explain his latest moves in Vietnam, for example. But this time he had a very, very different subject on his mind. The time has come for a new economic policy for the United States. Its targets are unemployment, inflation, and international speculation. Unemployment and inflation are big concerns for American voters. These are the early days of 1970s stagflation and both are on the rise. So Nixon lays out a radical set of new measures to tackle this stagflationary problem. That’s when inflation is really high and growth is stagnant. And these measures included investment subsidies, wage controls, price controls, and almost $5 billion worth of spending cuts, which was quite a big deal back then. So, drum roll. Then he turns to the international speculation bit of his address. In recent weeks, the speculators have been waging an allout war on the American dollar. So unknown to his audience that Sunday evening or indeed frankly most of his own government at the end of his address Nixon is about to fire that torpedo that we mentioned. I have directed the Secretary of the Treasury to take the action necessary to defend the dollar against the speculators. I have directed Secretary Connley to suspend temporarily the convertability of the dollar into gold or other reserve assets. Now the dollar’s value is tied to gold and every other major currency is tied to the dollar. So by cutting that link, Nixon is threatening to set a drift not only currency but all of his allies currencies as well in a chain reaction. This announcement would become known as the Nixon shock. in a single seemingly innocuous sentence. Whether he realized it or not, the US president had just upended the entire post-war global monetary system that underpinned a quarter century of rapid economic growth. And the thing to stress is that until that afternoon, nobody knew it was coming apart from Nixon and a tiny band of his very closest political allies who just spent the weekend together hold up in a secret meeting in a forest retreat in Maryland. So, how did it all come about? How did it go down with America’s allies? What would the consequences be, not least for the US dollar? And these are questions that keep reverberating through history. And we’re going to be talking about this now in the story of money from the Financial Times with me Jillian Tet and me Robin Wigglesworth. [music] What happens next in the story of money? New has spent over 125 years helping clients answer this question. By investing in the growth of businesses, real estate, infrastructure, and natural capital, we continue to deepen our expertise across income and alternatives so investors can confidently write the next chapter of their own portfolio stories. New invest like the future is watching. Visit newven.com/future to learn more. Investing involves risk, principal losses possible. So, in today’s episode, we’ll be combining high finance with international monetary policy and the sometimes grubby inner workings of the Nixon administration. And to tell this amazing story, we have the perfect guest, Jeffrey Garton. Jeffrey, welcome to the show. Thank you. It’s a pleasure to be here. We’re so pleased to have you. Yeah. I mean, Jeffrey, you personally embody three different strands of this story because you worked in high finance as a managing director of Lehman long before it went bust of course. You worked on sovereign debt restructuring, a subject close to my heart. You worked at the Blackstone Group and you’re also an academic economist with a focus on international trade, finance, and business. And you’re currently dean emeritus at Yale. And if that wasn’t enough, you’ve also found time to do a lot of work in the US government. You were under secretary of commerce under Bill Clinton. Before that, you worked for the Carter administration, the Ford administration, and believe it or not, the Nixon administration. Is that right? You actually worked for Nixon. I was very young, but I did. And what was he like to work for? Cuz of course, history hasn’t been that kind to him. I was nowhere near him personally, but I was on something called the Council on International Economic Policy, which was the equivalent of the National Security Council in the White House, and I I was at least exposed to all of the economic and financial issues of the time. Well, that sounds unbelievably relevant to what we’re talking about today. I mean, you also wrote obviously the book on the subject of of this episode. It’s called Three Days at Camp David. And Camp David, of course, is the Maryland retreat where the secret meeting took place in 1971 that thrashed out this Nixon shock policy announcement. Uh so Jeffrey, I mean, this is a big story, so we’re actually going to split it over two episodes because frankly Jill and I have been looking forward to this one. And you’re going to be our guy through both of them very kindly. I hope I can do it. So let’s get started. As Robin mentioned, that TV broadcast by Nixon in 1971 torpedoed the post-war global economic order. And that postwar global economic order in question was the same one that we looked at in a previous episode with Ed Conway, the so-called Bretonwood system. As a reminder, back in 1944, in the final months of World War II, the US organized a massive summit for all its allies at the Breton Woods Resort in New Hampshire. And for the US, this conference was actually another front in its emerging postwar hegemony. So whilst the US military was conquering Germany and Japan on the battlefields of Europe and the Pacific at Breton Woods, the US dollar finally and comprehensively conquered the British pound to become formally enshrined as the world’s leading currency. And what that meant in practice was that all of America’s trading partners fixed their currencies exchange rates to the dollar and the US in turn pegged the dollar’s value to gold. So Jeffrey, the dollar became the lynchpin of the global monetary system. So can you explain how and why what that really meant in practice to have the dollar as the center of the Bretonwood system? Well, the uh people at Bretton Woods, especially the US and the UK, wanted to make a new monetary system that would avoid the problems of the 1930s, a time in which there was enormous amount of protectionism. And so they decided that there should be one stable currency in the middle of the whole system. And that was naturally the dollar because the US currency was so strong and basically everybody wanted it. Yeah. And the US had all the gold at the time as well, right? And the US had about 60% of the world’s gold. And the US basically said, “Anyone who wants to redeem their dollars in gold, we will give you $35 per ounce of gold.” And the idea was the dollar would be the central stake in the system. It would be like the planet o around which all the other planets revolved. And everybody at that moment had confidence that the US could pull this off in large part because it had so much gold that anyone who wanted to exchange their currency for gold was given a commitment that the US would do that. And so this was seen as a very very stable system and the objective was not that monetary stability would lead to more trade. The whole focus really was on the expansion of trade. Well, that’s a great point. I mean, one of the consequences of this from what you’re saying is that it meant that the system was totally asymmetric. I mean essentially other countries were dependent on the US and its promises to convert dollars into gold. Is that correct? Absolutely. And I think it’s it’s hard for us to conceive today, but the US was so preeminent at that moment. It was not only the world’s most powerful military machine, but it was the only country in the world that came out of the Second World War stronger than when it went in. And so the amount of confidence that other countries had that they could lean on the US and that the US was their only hope was really palpable and there really was no alternative because the US basically was calling the shots. Okay. So so this is the Montre system that Nixon would eventually inherit a quarter of a century later when he became president in 1969. the same system he would go on to wreck with that TV announcement in 71 ending the convertability of dollars into gold and of course with everybody else pegged to the dollar that was a big deal but it was kind of surprising because in economic terms the Breton Woods era seemed to be resounding success right Jeff I mean those 25 years before Nixon came to power have been called sort of a golden age of rapid and stable growth and booming international trade I mean even the French who who like to complain as much as we Brits do Uh they call it the tron glossy glorers, right? Uh how much credit does the Bretonwood system deserve for delivering that economic record? It deserves a lot of credit. The thing is that the system it worked but it was under a lot of strain right from the beginning because the uh task of helping Japan and Europe recover was much much bigger than anyone envisioned. And so it was at first really the US that supplied all the funds, not the International Monetary Fund, which itself was a creation of Breton Woods. And if you looked at the Eisenhower administration and then the Kennedy administration and then the Johnson administration, there were great strains on Bretonwoods and the strains got bigger and bigger, but it held until the Nixon administration. But let’s discuss those strains. What were they? What were the main sort of fault lines on the financial side of things then? Well, the key strain was this that the whole system depended on countries outside the US accepting the dollar, using the dollar, and knowing that if they ever wanted to, they could take the dollars they were using and exchange it for gold at a fixed rate. At first, nobody denied that the US had enough gold. In 1955, for example, the middle of the Eisenhower administration, a calculation was made that the US had 165% more gold than it needed to redeem all the dollars outside the US. But by 1970, 1971, it only had 25%. So over the period it became clearer and clearer that the basic commitment of exchanging the dollar for gold uh was uh not credible and the big strain came because there were so many dollars in circulation that countries felt they didn’t need all those dollars and also they were very worried about the way the US managed its economy. and they were afraid that inflation in the US would actually reduce the value of the dollars they were holding. So all through this period there was a fear in the US and actually in other countries too that they would come to the US say here are dollars we want gold and the US wouldn’t be able to redeem it at this stage I think even Germany alone had more dollars than there was gold in Fort Knox right that’s probably true that the amount of gold relative to dollars outside the US became uh lower and lower and lower. And it wasn’t that people didn’t know this because the US published this statistics. Um, but they simply didn’t want to abandon the system, the Britainwood system for fear that they didn’t know what was on the other end. Okay, let’s pause and unpick that a little bit. uh because these dollars were flowing out of the US because it had switched from having a gargantuan trade surplus after World War II to actually having a trade deficit by 1971. And partially that was because the Kennedy and the Johnson administrations in the 1960s had brought in all these new welfare benefits, the the so-called Great Society programs, things like Medicare, Medicaid, uh food stamps, great stuff, right? core things that we think of now. Uh but all this government spending helped push the US economy into a trade deficit. And then on top of that, the US government was also spending a ton of money on the Vietnam war as well. So you suddenly had a country with a big trade deficit, a big budget deficit, more and more government debt, and more and more dollars flowing out of the country. Suddenly the US was not managing its economy well. its trade competitiveness was declining as Japan and and Germany and other European countries uh were recovering and so there were more and more dollars in circulation. So in practical terms that meant the dollar was massively overvalued. People could see that or sense it. And of course, one of the big problems is that when you have governments that are trying to manage the value of a currency, what’s happening with inflation matters enormously. And that was starting to go wrong as well, wasn’t it, Jeff? Yeah. The thing is that all the trade for the United States exports and imports was only about seven or eight% of the GDP. So from a American standpoint, they simply couldn’t manage their economy to satisfy international requirements. It was a domesticallybased economy. But from the standpoint of other countries, they were very very concerned because US economic management was so domestically oriented. And Julian, as you said, it led to a lot of inflation. It meant that the fiscal and monetary policies were all about the US and US growth and the rest of the world was a secondary consideration. Well, all of this has started to sound horribly familiar, I must say. But yes, there was also the argument that was put forward by Robert Triffin in 1959 that it was actually the international demand for dollars that was the key factor driving things, wasn’t it? What was the so-called um Triffin dilemma that lots of economic students have to study? Basically, what Triffin said was if the dollar is going to be an the international currency, you would need more and more dollars to finance what was an ever growing global economy. There was more and more trade, more and more need for dollars. But that meant that the US had to run deficits in order to supply those dollars. And at some point, the size of the deficits would be so great that it would cast doubt on whether or not these dollars were worth what everybody thought they should be. And certainly, it meant that the dollars could not be redeemed in gold. I don’t think anybody anticipated how quickly Europe and Japan recovered and how much the dollar was in demand until it wasn’t. So you take the 1950s, people talked about a dollar shortage. There wasn’t enough dollars to finance all the the increase in global trade. But by the 1960s, they talked about a dollar glut. there were too many dollars. And so Triffin, the Triffin dilemma was basically uh indicating that at some point this system had to be totally restructured. And of course that shows once again in a way that’s very relevant today that things can seem incredibly stable and secure and fixed and permanent until suddenly they’re not. Exactly. There’s just one other thing from that Nixon announcement in in August of 1971 that I’m really curious to hear your thoughts on. He talked about these uh international speculators in the TV address and it’s very vague and oblique as it were. Who were these speculators? What were they getting up to and why was Nixon so angry at them? If I could take one moment for history during the Brettonwoods discussions, it was all about stable exchange rates and the expansion of trade. And there was no contemplation of private capital and its importance. In fact, the Brettonwoods uh uh officials, they didn’t like private capital crossing borders. They thought that was one of the reasons why then there was such a collapse in finance in the 1930s. But capital will come when it comes and it will go where it goes. And by the late 50s, early 60s, it was clear that private capital was moving across borders in ever greater amounts and with ever greater speed. And there emerged a capital market in Europe called the Euro dollar market. uh these were dollars and European banks that were not regulated by either the Europeans or by the US. And so what Nixon was talking about was there was a ma massive amount of capital that was available for speculation. And he attributed this speculation to a lot of the financial crises that occurred in the 60s. devaluation of the British pound, revaluation of the German mark. He called them financial speculators because he was trying to make them the enemy uh and therefore uh justify all the other measures he was talking about in August 15th. Well, I I have Jeff and Jillian, I have a confession to make. I’ve actually visited the previously Sovietrun bank in Paris that apparently gave the name to Euro dollars. So this was a staterun bank uh from the Soviet Union in Paris uh on the Houseman Boulevard. Uh and its um telegram name or address was Euro Bank. And apparently a lot of dollars that the Soviet owned bank had accumulated through exports were held there sort of away from seizure from the Americans. And that’s how euro dollars became known as Euro Dollars. And it’s a very geeky thing, but I visited that bank. I took a selfie outside it because I thought it was quite a cool little moment of financial history. It was a big thing. It was a big thing in the 50s and 60s and it was something never contemplated at Britain Woods. Exactly. Well, I would say that the beginning of the dollar crisis, the very beginning was actually I guess it was 1960, very end of the Eisenhower administration. the secretary of the treasury, he made a trip to Germany, twisted Germany’s arms, first of all, not to redeem dollars into gold, but also to accelerate the repayments of the Marshall Plan, to pay more for the American troops in Germany. And that was the beginning of the recognition that there had to be a big change. And all through the Kennedy administration, um, there were efforts to control the outflow of dollars from the US. And those efforts got more intense during the Johnson administration. And along the way, Great Britain devalued, I can’t remember how many times I think it was twice. And that created shivers through the system because the pound sterling was seen as a major currency and it made others look at the dollar and say are you next? So by the time Johnson came in he put controls he put real controls on outflows of dollars but it still didn’t work. So the crisis just got bigger and bigger and when Nixon was elected, it was about to burst open. And we are going to find out just how much peril the dollar was in and what kind of difference this newly elected President Nixon was going to make after the break. [music] The future of fixed income investing will continue to blur the lines between public and private markets. New’s credit platform was built to navigate the shifting landscape, channeling capital toward the businesses, infrastructure, and energy solutions that are shaping tomorrow’s economy, all while aiming to deliver the resilience and returns that portfolios seek today. New invest like the future is watching. Visit newven.com/future to learn more. Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible. [music] Well, welcome back. So, just to recap, it’s 1969. The dollar’s position is beginning to look decidably wobbly. The dollar’s reserves piling up in the foreign central banks are already worth two to three times the value of US Federal Reserve’s entire gold reserves. So the question is, will the US be able to honor its pledges or is something going to crack? And this was the moment that Richard Nixon stepped onto the stage. It won the 1968 election, ending 8 years of democratic rule. So Jeffrey, these days, the Nixon presidency is obviously overshadowed and and severely tarnished by the Watergate scandal that came later. Can you tell us a bit more about the man that was inaugurated as president that January in 1969 when Watergate was frankly still just an ugly hotel in Washington? What was Nixon’s background? What kind of values did Nixon bring to the White House at the time? And what was he like to work for? Well, the Nixon that actually took office was uh a respected, experienced uh public figure. He had been the vice president for President Eisenhower for eight years. He was acknowledged to be very sophisticated strategist when it came to foreign policy and international affairs. He was welcomed because after JFK and the Johnson administrations, there had been so much spending on social programs and a Republican administration coming in uh was seen as as as really necessary to pair back these very very lofty ambitions, many of which didn’t really pan out. Nixon also surrounded himself with uh an extraordinary group of people particularly in the finance and economic realm. So I think that in 1970 when he took office there were really high hopes that he was the right person. I mean do you see any similarities between Richard Nixon and and today Donald Trump? They both saw themselves as political outsiders. They despised the East Coast elites. They had these incredible political comebacks after they’d been written off. And obviously they were both uh more sort of nationalistic uh figures, if I can use that phrase, than their democratic predecessors had been. I wondered how long that’s going to take you to get to the T-word, the Trump word. Yes, exactly. That is indeed a question I think many people would ask immediately. First, let me let me talk about the distinctions. Nixon was very experienced as a public figure. He was a political heavyweight, right? He was a political heavyweight. He had been in the Congress. Um, he had been vice president. I said, as I said, he had traveled the world. He knew a lot of statesmen and actually he also had a very deep knowledge of public policy. He was into budgets. He also did things that were not expected of him. for example, a conservative administration set up the uh Environmental Protection Agency. Um, and so for all those reasons, I think he is very distinguishable from from Trump. Where they sound very similar is they both very revengeful. They are looking for the big grand gesture. The height of Nixon’s fame was really uh Nixon going to China. Nixon who had been a very highly anti-communist uh public figure going to China. That was a big big move and Nixon just delighted in shocking his you know shocking the audience. He was not a nationalist in the way that Trump is. Um, in fact, one of the major things about the Nixon shock is that it was designed to make an adjustment in Breton Woods, but in no way was it designed to wreck Breton Woods. In fact, Nixon kept emphasizing that he believed in free trade, he believed in free flows of capital, that there had to be an adjustment so that the system could endure. It was no No question about the Nixon administration’s wanting the the the spirit of Bretonwoods, the the multilateralism, you know, the economic liberalism. They wanted all that to continue. They just said there was an imbalance at the center. Whereas Trump basically has totally disrupted the global economy and no I don’t think anybody can say that he has a vision for where it should go other than that the US should be um the big the big beast in the jungle. But obviously Nixon was quite different from some of his democratic predecessors, right? How quickly did America’s allies realize they were dealing with somebody fundamentally different in the White House? Someone who, while maybe not intending to shatter the Bretonwood system, was at least willing to take radical steps that could put it at risk. When did the rest of the world realize that something was a foot? Well, I think what really disturbed other countries was that the strains on Britain would were getting bigger and bigger. And when the Nixon administration came in, Nixon had a policy of what was called at the time benign neglect, they just didn’t want to deal with it. And this infuriated the Europeans and the Japanese because they at least wanted the US to be trying. And so as these strains built up and as Washington basically said to the rest of the world, in fact the secretary of the treasury John Connelly said this, it’s our dollar, but it’s your problem. This really got other countries worried that the US was going to allow the system to collapse and not do anything about it. So when Nixon announced his series of measures in August 1971, it came as a great surprise. But Nixon may have shown benign neglect, as you put it, towards the international monetary system, but he wasn’t afraid to take an aggressive stance towards US allies in other foreign policy domains. I mean, there was the Nixon doctrine, of course. Well, the Nixon doctrine was very important because [clears throat] what Nixon basically said there, 1969, he was really talking about Vietnam, but he said that the US would no longer supply soldiers and weapons to every country that was fighting communism, that they would only do this for their close allies. But the Nixon doctrine was interpreted as meaning the US cannot shoulder all these burdens. And in fact, that’s exactly what was happening in the financial arena that Nixon was saying. We need more burden sharing, a term we hear a lot about today. We need other countries to expand their uh defense budgets. We need other countries to contribute more to the World Bank and the IMF. We just couldn’t afford to do it all. And this question about the dollar in gold was really a major part of that. Just to recap, you’ve got a dollar that’s looking increasingly overvalued. And you’ve also got these swelling trade imbalances where essentially Japan and West Germany are running huge trade surpluses, getting loads of dollars as a result. and the whole system’s looking more and more potentially strained if not unstable. As I understand it, one of the things that Nixon complained a lot about was the idea that um Germany and Japan weren’t opening up their markets enough and that was very unfair. Again, that’s got echoes of today. I’m curious from the perspective of Germany and Japan though, or West Germany as it was then, who did they blame for the system coming under strain? Well, they certainly thought the US was mismanaging its economy. Um, and they felt that uh there was too much inflation in the US. For example, we had a lot of collective bargaining between labor and business driving up wages and driving up prices. But I think, you know, looking at it, looking at it dispassionately, everybody was to blame. The Germans were mercantalistic. The Japanese were really mercantalistic. They were super super competitive. I give you just one one number. Between 1965 and 1970, America’s exports of goods increased 100%. Germany’s increased 200%. And Japan’s increased 400%. So the whole system was under great strain and the US basically was confronting a lack of competitiveness a lot of the same issues that we have now. Okay. So we are now in a situation where the US economy is huge and dominant but maybe a little bit less dominant than it had been. The Bundes Bank in West Germany, the Bank of Japan in Tokyo, all these foreign central banks are accumulating massive halls of dollars. But they’re becoming quietly more and more concerned about how convertible these dollars will be into gold because the system was just not looking as sustainable. The US gold reserves just weren’t what they once were. But of course, everybody wanted to keep the Bretonwood system alive. I mean, even Nixon, as you said, Jeffrey, didn’t actually want to demolish it. But of course, you also have these speculators to contend with, these evil money men, right? Uh the euro dollars sloshing around capitalizing on the devaluations of the pound, the Frank in the 1960s. And by May 1971, things really start coming to a head for the dollar. Right. So tell us what happened that month. the dollar started to flow into Germany. There was a sense that Germany was going to have to revalue its currency and the speculators were betting that it would and so they wanted to get in early and massive amounts of dollars flowed into Germany such that it had to basically stop accepting dollars altogether. And it was really clear the US was petrified that now countries were going to come with all these dollars and ask for the gold and there wasn’t enough gold. And so if there had been this gold rush so to speak, the US would have de facto defaulted on a on a treaty commitment. And they were not only worried that this would be disastrous for the global financial system, but that it would call into question all other US commitments on the on the security side. So by the end of May, Nixon and his close advisers really began to think through what they had to do. Apparently in the newspapers at the time, there was fear of of of the French. So the French had been pulling their physical gold out of the United States for a while and keeping it in Paris. But in the summer of 71, uh, President Pompidu sent a battleship to collect the last remaining French gold that was held at the New York Federal Reserve and that made headlines. And obviously it was just physically moving gold from one place to the next. It was France’s gold. But there apparently was part of this general feeling that things were fraying and maybe about to unravel at that time probably. So, but countries were holding off for the most part because uh the the bread andwood system had been so successful. There was enormous fear about what would happen if the system cracked. And so the central banks were actually in very close coordination. They were not going to make the decision to take their currencies and exchange it for gold. But they didn’t have control over their governments who might do that. They also I think there was a fear especially Germany and Japan. And here’s where the foreign policy stuff comes in again. The US was their protector. The US was the country that was basically supplying the the military protection. And so while on economic and financial terms they might want to exchange their the their currency for gold, they were quite uncertain about what the United States reaction would be uh in in the foreign policy and defense arenas. So there was kind of a standstill except every once in a while France would would come in and and want some gold. Belgium would do that. They were not great amounts, but they were enough to really worry the US. What if what if Germany and Japan actually changed their mind? Because US policies were failing. Um, as Jillian said, there was more inflation, there was more unemployment, the collective bargaining system was out of whack, the balance of payments deficit was getting bigger. Robin, I think you you alluded to this that in 1971, for the first time since 1893, the US ran a deficit on the merchandise trade balance. That was a real shocker because up until then there were sufficient trade surpluses to pay for a lot of America’s overseas expenses. But when the balance of trade turned negative, it really appeared that the game was up. So the pressures are building, things are looking increasingly unsustainable. Something’s going to have to give. The question is what? So that’s our cliffhanger. And you will find out in the next episode what happens to the dollar, what happens to the Brettonwood system, and what happens to America’s position in the world as a whole. Part two of the Nixon shock here on the story of money with me Jillian Tat and me Robin Wigglesworth and Professor Jeffrey Garten. Thank you so much for being with us here today. We’re really looking forward to having you back on the show next week. I look forward to it too. We’ll meet again here next week.